|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- Since 1995, there has been a major shift in the
- Louisiana sugarcane industry away from whole-
- stalk harvesting. Today more than 90% of the
- cane in Louisiana is harvested as billets. A billet
- harvester cuts the cane into pieces ranging from 6
- to 14 inches in length and discharges it into a
- trailer moving alongside.
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
- The billet harvester knocks the cane down and
- bites into the surface of the row, taking along
- with the cane an abundance of trash such as tramp
- iron, sand, clay, clay balls, stones, bricks, leaves
- and tops. In the best case, a ton of cane contains
- 13% trash (8% inorganic and 5 % organic). Under
- wet conditions, a ton of cane may contain up to
- 40% trash (30% inorganic and 10% organic).
|
|
5
|
- Not only does this trash not contain sugar, but
- as it leaves the mill in the form of filter cake or
- bagasse, it carries away sugar at a rate of
- roughly 0.75 lbs per percentage point of trash.
- Each percentage point of trash represents a loss
- in production of about 3 lbs of sugar.
|
|
6
|
- In the case of 13% trash, production losses exceed
- 16%, and in the case of 40% trash, production
- losses exceed 50%. More trash means more
- maintenance, more flocculent, more lime, more
- natural gas, more unburned bagasse, more filter
- cake, more front-end loaders, more water treatment,
- more settling basins, more draglines to clean out
- settling basins, more haulage, more inversion,
|
|
7
|
- more molasses, less sugar and more cost. Surely
- there has to be a way to maximize the recovery of
- sugar and minimize the cost of producing it.
|
|
8
|
- All mechanical harvesters whether of potatoes,
- beets, carrots, salsifies and peas, face the same
- problem of the intrusion of foreign matter that varies
- widely in terms of grain size and density. For over
- 40 years, the vegetable industry in Europe battled
- this problem by means of vibratory screens, rotary
- trommels, optical sorters, air separators and a variety
- of dynamic effect separators
employing water.
|
|
9
|
- None of these technologies have worked.
- Likewise, we may try to screen, rinse, wash or
- scrub the billet, but all of these steps fall far short
- of producing an acceptable product. The average
- washing efficiency for a single deck washing
- table is about 53%, for a dual deck washing table,
- it is about 59%, and for a cane washing drum, it is
- about 44%. In a wet season as we have had this
|
|
10
|
- past year, these efficiencies would decline
- considerably. If a sugar mill wants to make
- money, produce a consistent product and
- eliminate the randomness associated with bad
- weather, there is only one process that will do the
- job: dense medium separation.
|
|
11
|
- The bi-directional dense medium separator
- patented by ESR is the most accurate separator
- ever used in the pre-processing of root vegetables.
- The smallest dense medium separator handles 100
- TPH of vegetables with an accuracy of separation
- unparalleled in the history of vegetable separation.
- Not only does it separate out the trash, but it can
- also separate a good potato from a bad potato,
|
|
12
|
- a good carrot from a bad carrot, a fresh carrot from a
- partially dehydrated carrot. It separates accurately,
- for example, a carrot of a 1.030 density from a carrot
- of a 1.033 density. Some ESR separators have been
- in operation for over 15 years. Most have been in
- operation for over 10 years. During this entire time,
- no one has ever established a single separation error
- in the processed vegetables.
|
|
13
|
- Most ESR separators are in continuous operation,
- night and day, 8 months per year. Nestle operates
- two potato separators at their Sitpa site in
- Rosiere, France, every day of the year, except on
- holidays and weekends.
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
- As many as 15 vegetable separators were sold to
- the largest canneries, farming co-operatives and
- vegetable wholesalers in Western Europe.
- Bonduelle, the largest vegetable processor in
- Western Europe, bought four vegetable separators,
- and they are now placing an order for a fifth. But
- someone might argue that even though this
- technology is successful in Europe, it is totally
- unproven with respect to sugarcane billets.
|
|
16
|
- It terms of size and shape, the billet is no different
- from a large carrot or a salsify. The salsify is a long
- root vegetable grown in a soil that is predominately
- clay, and since it is harvested in the middle of
- winter when it rains continuously, it generally
- comes from the field with over 60% clay. Nothing
- of this clay, not a single ounce, can ever be found in
- the salsifies exiting an ESR separator.
|
|
17
|
- The density of a sugarcane billet is no different
- from that of a sugar beet or potato. Variety 384
- accounts for 85% of what is currently planted
- today in Louisiana. The 321, 845 and the 555
- make up the rest. The 540 will be released this
- year. Let us look at their densities:
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
- Since the size, shape and density of the billet
- appear quite normal; since metal, stone and
- clay all have densities twice that of the billet;
- since Newton’s laws continue to operate at
- sugar mills, nothing is unproven about ESR
- technology. This technology has been around
- for over 18 years, and anyone trained in the art
- of dense medium separation would find it
|
|
20
|
- impossible to explain how it would not work in
- sugarcane.
- What is dense medium separation?
|
|
21
|
- Here we speak of the dynamic of a quiescent
- bath, where floats float and sinks sink. The
- specific gravity of water is changed by means
- of fine particles in suspension. In the case
- of vegetable, the suspension fines, for the most
- part, are derived from the fine sands and clays
- naturally found in the harvested vegetables.
|
|
22
|
- Most horizontal dense medium separators on
- the market today are mono-directional:
- floats and sinks move in the same direction.
- The ESR dense medium separator by contrast is
- bi-directional: floats move in one direction, while
- sinks move in the opposite
direction. Bi-
- directionality brings, as we shall see, a large
- number of significant advantages.
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
- There are four critical steps in making a good
- dense medium separation:
|
|
25
|
- In the ESR process, the material drops from a
- conveyor belt into an injector filled with a fast-
- moving stream of medium. The medium plus
- solids enter the separation zone, where they are
- well distributed over a broad 3-dimensional
- plane. This prevents floats, at the critical moment
- of entry into the separator, from
being buried or
- entrapped with sinks.
|
|
26
|
- Next: we need a stable yet non-viscous medium
- throughout bath. If the fines drop out of
- suspension, this leaves water at the top of the bath
- and a high density sludge at the bottom of the
- bath. In this situation, obviously no separation
- takes place. In billet separation, we do not have to
- worry about stability, since clay constitutes a large
- component of the inorganic debris.
|
|
27
|
- But since there is so much clay accompanying the
- billets, we should be concerned about viscosity. If
- the medium becomes too viscous, then it is
- impossible for particles to float or sink as rapidly
- as they should, and, once again, a bad separation
- takes place. That is why we foresee a series of
- classifying cyclones that continually reject clay
- but retain fine sand between 15 and 100 microns.
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
- ESR has mastered the art of working with fines
- naturally found in the material to be separated. In
- vegetable separation, salt in solution is commonly
- used, and in automobile shredder residue, a very
- expensive magnetite powder is commonly used.
- ESR pioneered the use of fine sand or silt to reach
- separating densities as high as 1.6 RD.
|
|
30
|
- The knives of the billet harvester generate large
- quantities of organic fines. These fines can easily
- compromise the fluidity of the separating medium
- and must be removed from the circuit as quickly
- as they enter. At each pass through the separating
- drum, it is absolutely essential that these organic
- fines be filtered out of the medium. A large rotary
- trommel screen, fitted with stainless steel wedge
|
|
31
|
- wire panels, is ideal in this regard. Once the
- billets are injected into a drum filled with a stable,
- non-viscous medium free of organic contaminates,
- the drum must offer, under quiescent and tranquil
- conditions, sufficient space and time for a
- separation to take place.
|
|
32
|
- A particle must have adequate time to float or
- sink. The length of the separation zone, therefore,
- is critical in assuring adequate residence time.
- The rise rate or sink rate of a near-gravity particle
- can be very low, and if it exits the separation zone
- before it has had a chance to float or sink, then it
- easily reports in the wrong direction. In contrast to
- many dense medium manufacturers,
|
|
33
|
- ESR put forward the principle or rule that the
- length of the separation zone must be twice that of
- the barrel diameter. Most dense medium drum
- manufacturers design drums of a large diameter
- but short length. ESR reversed this trend, offering
- a much smaller diameter relative to barrel length.
- Only in this way do we have a near-perfect floats
- dynamic.
|
|
34
|
- In order to minimize turbulence
in the separation
- zone, there should be no paddles moving floats
- along, as we see in the classical Drewboy
- separator. There should be no lifting of sinks
- within the separation zone, as we see in the
- conventional Wemco separator. There should be
- no curtains within the separation zone, as in the
- Wemco separator. The Wemco curtains, in
|
|
35
|
- conjunction with the lifters passing underneath,
- create a great deal of turbulence, that, all too
- often, completely destroys the accuracy of
- separation. Since Wemco lifts and evacuates sinks
- while they are in the separation zone, Wemco is
- obliged to put a sinks evacuation chute within the
- separation zone. Since Wemco lifts and evacuates
- sinks while they are in the separation zone,
|
|
36
|
- Wemco cannot rotate the separation drum more
- than 3 or 4 RPM. If the Wemco drum were to be
- rotated any faster, the turbulence created between
- the lifters and curtains would totally destroy the
- accuracy of separation. Since the inside of the
- Wemco separator is completely filled with lifters,
- curtains and chutes, the operator can see nothing
- of what is actually taking place within the
|
|
37
|
- separator. For example, if a curtain should break
- or tear, the operator sees nothing. But even more
- problematic is the fact the large width of Wemco
- separator is not actually used, since all separation
- is confined to the narrow zone between the two
- curtains running the full length of the separation
- zone.
|
|
38
|
- In contrast, the ESR separator has no lifters,
- curtains or chutes within the separation zone. All
- is clearly visible and transparent to the operator.
- The full surface of the bath is available for
- separation. An 8-foot diameter ESR drum can
- handle up to 200 TPH of floats, while an 11-foot
- drum can handle up to 400 TPH of floats.
|
|
39
|
- Since, in the ESR drum, sinks are given adequate
- space and time to sink, there is very little danger
- of finding sinks in floats. But how about floats in
- sinks?
- In the ESR drum, the curtain to prevent floats
- from reporting with sinks is situated completely
- outside the separation zone.
|
|
40
|
- Sinks are lifted up by means of a scrolled cone, but
- only when completely outside of the separation
- zone. This assures an enormous sinks evacuation
- capacity. The ESR drum can be rotated at 20 RPM
- if necessary, with no danger of floats reporting
- with sinks. An 8ft barrel can evacuate more than 50
- TPH of sinks, while an 11ft barrel can evacuate
- more than 150 TPH of sinks.
|
|
41
|
- It is this idea of placing the curtain completely
- outside the separation zone that forms the heart
- and core of the ESR patent. To accomplish this, it
- was necessary to increase the diameter of the sinks
- evacuation cone relative to the diameter of the
- mid-section of the drum.
|
|
42
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
44
|
- Since the ESR drum is bi-directional, dewatering
- and rinsing devices can be placed on both sides,
- easily handling a large volume of either floats or
- sinks. ESR no longer uses
vibratory dewatering
- screens. Large rotary screens fitted with stainless
- steel wedge wire panels are ideal, since they are
- robust and self-cleaning. Let us review once again
- the dynamics of the ESR drum.
|
|
45
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
51
|
- Perhaps the biggest objection to the dense medium
- separation of sugarcane billets concerns the loss of
- sugar associated with putting them in water. The
- washing of whole stalk cane had been in practice
- in Louisiana for about 50 years. But since the
- harvesting of a whole stalk involves but one or two
- cuts, the loss of sugar here does not exceed about
- one pound of sugar/TC.
|
|
52
|
- There are four factors that determine the loss of
- sugar with respect to billeted cane:
- the number of harvester cuts (billet length),
- the precision of the harvester cut (clean or frayed),
- the forces applied to the billet (agitation/tumbling),
- the amount of time the billet is subjected to these forces.
|
|
53
|
- In general, it is fairly safe to say that if all other
- factors are the same, twice the number of harvester
- cuts will yield twice the loss of sugar. In the study
- by Birkett and Stein, we see that short billets of
- an average length of 5.25 inches lose twice as
- much sugar as long billets of an average length of
- 9.55 inches (see Cane Washing Losses, pp. 3 & 4).
|
|
54
|
- If the billet harvester cutting blades are not sharp,
- they will damage and fray the ends of the billet.
- The same study by Birkett and Stein shows that
- sugar losses increase almost threefold if the billet
- is damaged (see p. 3). Therefore it is very important
- to change “the cutter blades on the combine
- harvester at the frequency recommended by the
- harvester manufacturer” (p.6).
|
|
55
|
- In vegetable separation, the handling of the carrot
- or salsify within the dense medium separation
- process is a very important issue. If, for example, a
- carrot or salsify is broken, it has little or no value.
- Several studies conducted in Europe have shown
- that the carrot remains undamaged throughout the
- entire DMS process. Likewise, if a billet is agitated
- or tumbled, either before or during the cleaning
|
|
56
|
- process, it will lose sugar and drop in value. That
- is why the scrubbing of the billet, as in a typical
- wash drum, is far from ideal. It would take at least 5
- minutes of violent scrubbing to break down the
- large clay balls that often accompany the billets.
- But a retention time of five minutes would require a
- scrub drum of an enormous length, and during this
- time, far too much sugar would be lost.
|
|
57
|
- The study by Birkett and Stein shows that if billets
- are placed in a cane preparation index apparatus
- and rotated at 19 RPM, a lot of sugar is released by
- this tumbling action. The longer the billet is
- tumbled, the greater the loss of sugar. In the first 30
- seconds, we see a loss of about one pound of
- sugar/TC, while after 15 minutes, this loss increases
- to almost 8 lbs/TC (see ibid., Figure 15).
|
|
58
|
- It would appear that the simple act of putting the
- billet in water releases very little sugar from
- within the billet. To determine the density of the
- billet, I once spent an entire day at the USDA lab in
- Houma weighing billets underwater. The billets
- were left in a tranquil bath of water for several
- hours at a time, and throughout the entire day, the
- water used in this test was never changed.
|
|
59
|
- At the end of the day, the amount of sugar in this
- water was indistinguishable from the amount of
- sugar present in the original tap water used for this
- density test. What can we learn from all of this?
- Water does not diffuse sugar out of a billet.
- Since the cell membrane of cane is resistant to
- osmotic effects, the cell wall must be ruptured
- and force must be applied to the wall of the billet.
|
|
60
|
- Once the billet is cut, every effort should be made
- to minimize all aspects of its handling. From field
- to factory, it should be loaded and unloaded but one
- time. It should never be dumped on a concrete
- slab or handled by a wheel loader. In the cleaning
- process, it should not be scrubbed, agitated or
- tumbled in any way, and it should not remain in a
- separator for more than about 10 seconds.
|
|
61
|
- If we do all of the above, then we have every reason
- to expect a sugar loss of less than 3 lbs/TC. This is
- roughly equivalent to the loss of production
- associated with only one per cent of trash/TC. The
- sugarcane industry in Louisiana has a lot to learn
- from the vegetable industry in Europe. If it handles
- billets with the same respect that the vegetable
- industry in Europe handles carrots, and if it
|
|
62
|
- separates billets with the same technology
- that Europe employs to separate carrots, then
- most of the problems created by the introduction of
- billet harvester in Louisiana are easily solved.
|
|
63
|
- Putting a billet in water will not cause sugar to
- come out of a billet. Putting a billet in water simply
- shows us how much we have mishandled it prior to
- putting it in water. The extremely gentle action of a
- dense medium separator can never be a major factor
- in sugar loss. Perhaps we need to adjust the length
- of the billet, change cutter blades more often,
- reduce the number of times we load and unload
|
|
64
|
- the billet, eliminate the use of wheel loaders,
- reduce the distance we allow a billet to fall, and so
- forth. It has taken 8 years for the billet harvester to
- dominate the sugarcane industry in Louisiana, and
- no doubt, it will take the same amount of time for
- this industry to correct the problems that the billet
- harvester has created.
|
|
65
|
- When billets are put in water, a considerable
- amount of water adheres to the cane, and this water
- increases the load on the evaporators. In the
- Birkett & Stein study, we see that single deck tables
- average 4.7% adhering water by weight, dual deck
- tables average 11.3%, and a washing drum
- averages 16.3%. In this dense medium process,
- the outgoing cane is rinsed twice: once with
|
|
66
|
- re-circulating rinse water, and then with a final
- clean water. It would be easy to equip the exit side
- of the floats trommel with lifters so as to tumble
- and dry the billets, but this might release a lot of
- sugar. We propose instead that the exit side of the
- trommel be fitted with a series of air knives that
- would remove adhering water without impacting
- the billet in any way.
|
|
67
|
- The leaves and tops of the sugarcane plant contain
- no sugar, and those that accompany the billet into
- the mill can be easily removed by means of an air
- separator. Since it is very important in air
- separation to minimize particle interference, the
- billets should be spread out over a broad two-
- dimensional plane, and the blower should be
- situated in-line with the flow of billets.
|
|
68
|
- This air separator can be situated right above the
- injector of the dense medium separator. After
- air separation, the billets should slide directly into
- the mouth of the injector. This would reduce the
- impact on the billet and minimize the loss of
- sugar.
|
|
69
|
- Hopefully it is clear that this dual strategy of air
- separation and dense medium separation can
- eliminate virtually all organic and inorganic trash.
- What mill in Louisiana has ever considered the
- possibility of processing billets without extraneous
- material? It is hard to imagine what this should
- mean. For the first time ever, a mill will be able to
- operate under constraints that are truly internal.
|
|
70
|
- A mill would possess a level of control in daily
- operations that it has never before experienced.
- More sugar would be recovered. Production would
- stabilize at a very high rate. Operating and
- maintenance cost would decrease considerably.
- Rain and even hurricanes would have minimal
- impact on profitability. And if we turn once again
- to Europe,
|
|
71
|
- we find to our amazement, that some vegetable
- brokers there have even figured out how to avoid
- trucking extraneous material to a factory and
- hauling it away. Taking full advantage of this dense
- medium separation technology, they set up de-
- centralized pre-processing centers in proximity to
- clusters of growers, and only clean vegetables are
- transported to the cannery.
|
|
72
|
- What would such a distribution model mean to the
- Louisiana sugar industry? What if relatively small
- dense medium separators were strategically situated
- so that only clean billets would be transported to the
- mill? Leaving trash where it belongs cannot be such
- a bad idea, and surely the grower is better equipped
- than anyone else to deal with it. Each ton that the
- grower delivers to the mill would be a ton of billets
|
|
73
|
- and nothing else. A modern billet harvester in full
- operation has a capacity of 200 TPH, but when we
- look at the total number of harvesters and the total
- tonnage of cane harvested in a given season, we see
- that a harvester averages less than 20 TPH. The
- Louisiana cane industry has invested over $80
- million dollars in harvester technology, more than
- twice what is demanded to meet its harvesting
|
|
74
|
- needs. At the same time, the cane industry would
- have to invest roughly $30 million dollars in dense
- medium separation technology. A 50% reduction
- in the number of harvesters equates to a savings
- of over $40 million dollars and easily covers the
- cost of this dense medium separation technology.
- The savings in the transport of trash to and from the
- mill would be well over $10 M dollars per season.
|
|
75
|
- Imagine a group of cane farmers working
- together: with one farmer specializing in harvesting,
- a second in dense medium separation, and a third in
- transport. If the primary objective is to make
- money, then a collaborative effort among farmers in
- the harvesting, cleaning and transport of the billet
- would be the most logical way to proceed.
|
|
76
|
- Such an approach would simplify every aspect of
- this complex sugar-making enterprise. It would
- offer growers and factories a myriad of new options
- and new economic opportunities, and at the same
- time, it would secure, safeguard and stabilize one of
- our state’s oldest and most important industries.
|