Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
The Science of Separation
 
The Elimination of
Extraneous Material
From Sugarcane Billets
2
Billet Harvester
  • Since 1995, there has been a major shift in the
  • Louisiana sugarcane industry away from whole-
  • stalk harvesting. Today more than 90% of the
  • cane in Louisiana is harvested as billets. A billet
  • harvester cuts the cane into pieces ranging from 6
  • to 14 inches in length and discharges it into a
  • trailer moving alongside.
3
Cameco
4
Inorganic Debris
  • The billet harvester knocks the cane down and
  • bites into the surface of the row, taking along
  • with the cane an abundance of trash such as tramp
  • iron, sand, clay, clay balls, stones, bricks, leaves
  • and tops. In the best case, a ton of cane contains
  • 13% trash (8% inorganic and 5 % organic). Under
  • wet conditions, a ton of cane may contain up to
  • 40% trash (30% inorganic and 10% organic).
5
Loss of Recoverable Sucrose
  • Not only does this trash not contain sugar, but
  • as it leaves the mill in the form of filter cake or
  • bagasse, it carries away sugar at a rate of
  • roughly 0.75 lbs per percentage point of trash.
  • Each percentage point of trash represents a loss
  • in production of about 3 lbs of sugar.
6
The High Cost of Trash
  • In the case of 13% trash, production losses exceed
  • 16%, and in the case of 40% trash, production
  • losses exceed 50%. More trash means more
  • maintenance, more flocculent, more lime, more
  • natural gas, more unburned bagasse, more filter
  • cake, more front-end loaders, more water treatment,
  • more settling basins, more draglines to clean out
  • settling basins, more haulage, more inversion,
7
The High Cost of Trash

  • more molasses, less sugar and more cost. Surely
  • there has to be a way to maximize the recovery of
  • sugar and minimize the cost of producing it.
8
Intrusion of Foreign Matter
  • All mechanical harvesters whether of potatoes,
  • beets, carrots, salsifies and peas, face the same
  • problem of the intrusion of foreign matter that varies
  • widely in terms of grain size and density. For over
  • 40 years, the vegetable industry in Europe battled
  • this problem by means of vibratory screens, rotary
  • trommels, optical sorters, air separators and a variety
  • of  dynamic effect separators employing water.
9
Intrusion of Foreign Matter
  • None of these technologies have worked.
  • Likewise, we may try to screen, rinse, wash or
  • scrub the billet, but all of these steps fall far short
  • of producing an acceptable product. The average
  • washing efficiency for a single deck washing
  • table is about 53%, for a dual deck washing table,
  • it is about 59%, and for a cane washing drum, it is
  • about 44%. In a wet season as we have had this
10
Intrusion of Foreign Matter
  • past year, these efficiencies would decline
  • considerably. If a sugar mill wants to make
  • money, produce a consistent product and
  • eliminate the randomness associated with bad
  • weather, there is only one process that will do the
  • job: dense medium separation.
11
Bi-Directional DMS
  • The bi-directional dense medium separator
  • patented by ESR is the most accurate separator
  • ever used in the pre-processing of root vegetables.
  • The smallest dense medium separator handles 100
  • TPH of vegetables with an accuracy of separation
  • unparalleled in the history of vegetable separation.
  • Not only does it separate out the trash, but it can
  • also separate a good potato from a bad potato,
12
Dense Medium Separator
  • a good carrot from a bad carrot, a fresh carrot from a
  • partially dehydrated carrot. It separates accurately,
  • for example, a carrot of a 1.030 density from a carrot
  • of a 1.033 density. Some ESR separators have been
  • in operation for over 15 years. Most have been in
  • operation for over 10 years. During this entire time,
  • no one has ever established a single separation error
  • in the processed vegetables.
13
Without Error
  • Most ESR separators are in continuous operation,
  • night and day, 8 months per year. Nestle operates
  • two potato separators at their Sitpa site in
  • Rosiere, France, every day of the year, except on
  • holidays and weekends.
14
Potato Separator
15
15 Units Sold
  • As many as 15 vegetable separators were sold to
  • the largest canneries, farming co-operatives and
  • vegetable wholesalers in Western Europe.
  • Bonduelle, the largest vegetable processor in
  • Western Europe, bought four vegetable separators,
  • and they are now placing an order for a fifth. But
  • someone might argue that even though this
  • technology is successful in Europe, it is totally
  • unproven with respect to sugarcane billets.
16
The Size and Shape of the Billet
  • It terms of size and shape, the billet is no different
  • from a large carrot or a salsify. The salsify is a long
  • root vegetable grown in a soil that is predominately
  • clay, and since it is harvested in the middle of
  • winter when it rains continuously, it generally
  • comes from the field with over 60% clay. Nothing
  • of this clay, not a single ounce, can ever be found in
  • the salsifies exiting an ESR separator.
17
The Density of the Billet
  • The density of a sugarcane billet is no different
  • from that of a sugar beet or potato. Variety 384
  • accounts for 85% of what is currently planted
  • today in Louisiana. The 321, 845 and the 555
  • make up the rest. The 540 will be released this
  • year. Let us look at their densities:
18
The Density of the Billet
19
Laws of Physics
  • Since the size, shape and density of the billet
  • appear quite normal; since metal, stone and
  • clay all have densities twice that of the billet;
  • since Newton’s laws continue to operate at
  • sugar mills, nothing is unproven about ESR
  • technology. This technology has been around
  • for over 18 years, and anyone trained in the art
  • of dense medium separation would find it
20
Laws of Physics
  • impossible to explain how it would not work in
  • sugarcane.
  • What is dense medium separation?
21
What is Dense
Medium Separation ?
  • Here we speak of the dynamic of a quiescent
  • bath, where floats float and sinks sink. The
  • specific gravity of water is changed by means
  • of fine particles in suspension. In the case
  • of vegetable, the suspension fines, for the most
  • part, are derived from the fine sands and clays
  • naturally found in the harvested vegetables.
22
Bi-Directional Dense Medium
  • Most horizontal dense medium separators on
  • the market today are mono-directional:
  • floats and sinks move in the same direction.
  • The ESR dense medium separator by contrast is
  • bi-directional: floats move in one direction, while
  • sinks move in the opposite  direction. Bi-
  • directionality brings, as we shall see, a large
  • number of significant advantages.
23
Cross-Sectional View
24
Four Critical Steps
  • There are four critical steps in making a good
  • dense medium separation:
25
1) Correct Injection
  • In the ESR process, the material drops from a
  • conveyor belt into an injector filled with a fast-
  • moving stream of medium. The medium plus
  • solids enter the separation zone, where they are
  • well distributed over a broad 3-dimensional
  • plane. This prevents floats, at the critical moment
  • of  entry into the separator, from being buried or
  • entrapped with sinks.
26
2) Good Medium
  • Next: we need a stable yet non-viscous medium
  • throughout bath. If the fines drop out of
  • suspension, this leaves water at the top of the bath
  • and a high density sludge at the bottom of the
  • bath. In this situation, obviously no separation
  • takes place. In billet separation, we do not have to
  • worry about stability, since clay constitutes a large
  • component of the inorganic debris.
27
2) A Good Medium
  • But since there is so much clay accompanying the
  • billets, we should be concerned about viscosity. If
  • the medium becomes too viscous, then it is
  • impossible for particles to float or sink as rapidly
  • as they should, and, once again, a bad separation
  • takes place. That is why we foresee a series of
  • classifying cyclones that continually reject clay
  • but retain fine sand between 15 and 100 microns.
28
Classifying Cyclones
29
Fine Silt/Sand
  • ESR has mastered the art of working with fines
  • naturally found in the material to be separated. In
  • vegetable separation, salt in solution is commonly
  • used, and in automobile shredder residue, a very
  • expensive magnetite powder is commonly used.
  • ESR pioneered the use of fine sand or silt to reach
  • separating densities as high as 1.6 RD.
30
Organic Contaminates
  • The knives of the billet harvester generate large
  • quantities of organic fines. These fines can easily
  • compromise the fluidity of the separating medium
  • and must be removed from the circuit as quickly
  • as they enter. At each pass through the separating
  • drum, it is absolutely essential that these organic
  • fines be filtered out of the medium. A large rotary
  • trommel screen, fitted with stainless steel wedge
31
An Ideal Medium
  • wire panels, is ideal in this regard. Once the
  • billets are injected into a drum filled with a stable,
  • non-viscous medium free of organic contaminates,
  • the drum must offer, under quiescent and tranquil
  • conditions, sufficient space and time for a
  • separation to take place.
32
3) Floats Dynamic
  • A particle must have adequate time to float or
  • sink. The length of the separation zone, therefore,
  • is critical in assuring adequate residence time.
  • The rise rate or sink rate of a near-gravity particle
  • can be very low, and if it exits the separation zone
  • before it has had a chance to float or sink, then it
  • easily reports in the wrong direction. In contrast to
  • many dense medium manufacturers,
33
3) Floats Dynamic
  • ESR put forward the principle or rule that the
  • length of the separation zone must be twice that of
  • the barrel diameter. Most dense medium drum
  • manufacturers design drums of a large diameter
  • but short length. ESR reversed this trend, offering
  • a much smaller diameter relative to barrel length.
  • Only in this way do we have a near-perfect floats
  • dynamic.
34
3) Floats Dynamic
  • In order to minimize  turbulence in the separation
  • zone, there should be no paddles moving floats
  • along, as we see in the classical Drewboy
  • separator. There should be no lifting of sinks
  • within the separation zone, as we see in the
  • conventional Wemco separator. There should be
  • no curtains within the separation zone, as in the
  • Wemco separator. The Wemco curtains, in
35
3) Floats Dynamic
  • conjunction with the lifters passing underneath,
  • create a great deal of turbulence, that, all too
  • often, completely destroys the accuracy of
  • separation. Since Wemco lifts and evacuates sinks
  • while they are in the separation zone, Wemco is
  • obliged to put a sinks evacuation chute within the
  • separation zone. Since Wemco lifts and evacuates
  • sinks while they are in the separation zone,
36
3) Floats Dynamic
  • Wemco cannot rotate the separation drum more
  • than 3 or 4 RPM. If the Wemco drum were to be
  • rotated any faster, the turbulence created between
  • the lifters and curtains would totally destroy the
  • accuracy of separation. Since the inside of the
  • Wemco separator is completely filled with lifters,
  • curtains and chutes, the operator can see nothing
  • of what is actually taking place within the
37
3) Floats Dynamic
  • separator. For example, if a curtain should break
  • or tear, the operator sees nothing. But even more
  • problematic is the fact the large width of Wemco
  • separator is not actually used, since all separation
  • is confined to the narrow zone between the two
  • curtains running the full length of the separation
  • zone.
38
3) Floats Dynamic
  • In contrast, the ESR separator has no lifters,
  • curtains or chutes within the separation zone. All
  • is clearly visible and transparent to the operator.
  • The full surface of the bath is available for
  • separation. An 8-foot diameter ESR drum can
  • handle up to 200 TPH of floats, while an 11-foot
  • drum can handle up to 400 TPH of floats.
39
3) Floats Dynamic
  • Since, in the ESR drum, sinks are given adequate
  • space and time to sink, there is very little danger
  • of finding sinks in floats. But how about floats in
  • sinks?


  • In the ESR drum, the curtain to prevent floats
  • from reporting with sinks is situated completely
  • outside the separation zone.
40
4) Sinks Dynamic
  • Sinks are lifted up by means of a scrolled cone, but
  • only when completely outside of the separation
  • zone. This assures an enormous sinks evacuation
  • capacity. The ESR drum can be rotated at 20 RPM
  • if necessary, with no danger of floats reporting
  • with sinks. An 8ft barrel can evacuate more than 50
  • TPH of sinks, while an 11ft barrel can evacuate
  • more than 150 TPH of sinks.
41
US Patent 5,373,946
  • It is this idea of placing the curtain completely
  • outside the separation zone that forms the heart
  • and core of the ESR patent. To accomplish this, it
  • was necessary to increase the diameter of the sinks
  • evacuation cone relative to the diameter of the
  • mid-section of the drum.
42
Top View
43
Side View
44
High Capacity
  • Since the ESR drum is bi-directional, dewatering
  • and rinsing devices can be placed on both sides,
  • easily handling a large volume of either floats or
  • sinks.  ESR no longer uses vibratory dewatering
  • screens. Large rotary screens fitted with stainless
  • steel wedge wire panels are ideal, since they are
  • robust and self-cleaning. Let us review once again
  • the dynamics of the ESR drum.
45
Side View
46
Chaparral Steel
10 ft Diameter Drum
47
100 TPH Billet Separator
48
200 TPH Billet Separator
49
400 TPH Billet Separator
50
Largest and Smallest
51
The Billet in Water
  • Perhaps the biggest objection to the dense medium
  • separation of sugarcane billets concerns the loss of
  • sugar associated with putting them in water. The
  • washing of whole stalk cane had been in practice
  • in Louisiana for about 50 years. But since the
  • harvesting of a whole stalk involves but one or two
  • cuts, the loss of sugar here does not exceed about
  • one pound of sugar/TC.
52
Sugar Losses
  • There are four factors that determine the loss of
  • sugar with respect to billeted cane:
  • the number of harvester cuts (billet length),
  • the precision of the harvester cut (clean or frayed),
  • the forces applied to the billet (agitation/tumbling),
  • the amount of time the billet is subjected to these forces.
53
Short - Long Billets
  • In general, it is fairly safe to say that if all other
  • factors are the same, twice the number of harvester
  • cuts will yield twice the loss of sugar. In the study
  • by Birkett and Stein, we see that short billets of
  • an average length of 5.25 inches lose twice as
  • much sugar as long billets of an average length of
  • 9.55 inches (see Cane Washing Losses, pp. 3 & 4).
54
The Precision of the Cut
  • If the billet harvester cutting blades are not sharp,
  • they will damage and fray the ends of the billet.
  • The same study by Birkett and Stein shows that
  • sugar losses increase almost threefold if the billet
  • is damaged (see p. 3). Therefore it is very important
  • to change “the cutter blades on the combine
  • harvester at the frequency recommended by the
  • harvester manufacturer” (p.6).
55
The Forces Applied to the Billet
  • In vegetable separation, the handling of the carrot
  • or salsify within the dense medium separation
  • process is a very important issue. If, for example, a
  • carrot or salsify is broken, it has little or no value.
  • Several studies conducted in Europe have shown
  • that the carrot remains undamaged throughout the
  • entire DMS process. Likewise, if a billet is agitated
  • or tumbled, either before or during the cleaning
56
The Handling of the Billet
  • process, it will lose sugar and drop in value. That
  • is why the scrubbing of the billet, as in a typical
  • wash drum, is far from ideal. It would take at least 5
  • minutes of violent scrubbing to break down the
  • large clay balls that often accompany the billets.
  • But a retention time of five minutes would require a
  • scrub drum of an enormous length, and during this
  • time, far too much sugar would be lost.
57
The Importance of Time
  • The study by Birkett and Stein shows that if billets
  • are placed in a cane preparation index apparatus
  • and rotated at 19 RPM, a lot of sugar is released by
  • this tumbling action. The longer the billet is
  • tumbled, the greater the loss of sugar. In the first 30
  • seconds, we see a loss of about one pound of
  • sugar/TC, while after 15 minutes, this loss increases
  • to almost 8 lbs/TC (see ibid., Figure 15).
58
The Handling of the Billet
  • It would appear that the simple act of putting the
  • billet in water releases very little sugar from
  • within the billet. To determine the density of the
  • billet, I once spent an entire day at the USDA lab in
  • Houma weighing billets underwater. The billets
  • were left in a tranquil bath of water for several
  • hours at a time, and throughout the entire day, the
  • water used in this test was never changed.
59
The Handling of the Billet
  • At the end of the day, the amount of sugar in this
  • water was indistinguishable from the amount of
  • sugar present in the original tap water used for this
  • density test. What can we learn from all of this?
  • Water does not diffuse sugar out of a billet.
  • Since the cell membrane of cane is resistant to
  • osmotic effects, the cell wall must be ruptured
  • and force must be applied to the wall of the billet.
60
What Can We Learn?
  • Once the billet is cut, every effort should be made
  • to minimize all aspects of its handling. From field
  • to factory, it should be loaded and unloaded but one
  • time. It should never be dumped on a concrete
  • slab or handled by a wheel loader. In the cleaning
  • process, it should not be scrubbed, agitated or
  • tumbled in any way, and it should not remain in a
  • separator for more than about 10 seconds.
61
Loss of Sugar
  • If we do all of the above, then we have every reason
  • to expect a sugar loss of less than 3 lbs/TC. This is
  • roughly equivalent to the loss of production
  • associated with only one per cent of trash/TC. The
  • sugarcane industry in Louisiana has a lot to learn
  • from the vegetable industry in Europe. If it handles
  • billets with the same respect that the vegetable
  • industry in Europe handles carrots, and if it
62
European Model
  • separates billets with the same technology
  • that Europe employs to separate carrots, then
  • most of the problems created by the introduction of
  • billet harvester in Louisiana are easily solved.
63
The Billet in Water
  • Putting a billet in water will not cause sugar to
  • come out of a billet. Putting a billet in water simply
  • shows us how much we have mishandled it prior to
  • putting it in water. The extremely gentle action of a
  • dense medium separator can never be a major factor
  • in sugar loss. Perhaps we need to adjust the length
  • of the billet, change cutter blades more often,
  • reduce the number of times we load and unload
64
Takes Time
  • the billet, eliminate the use of wheel loaders,
  • reduce the distance we allow a billet to fall, and so
  • forth. It has taken 8 years for the billet harvester to
  • dominate the sugarcane industry in Louisiana, and
  • no doubt, it will take the same amount of time for
  • this industry to correct the problems that the billet
  • harvester has created.
65
Adhering Water
  • When billets are put in water, a considerable
  • amount of water adheres to the cane, and this water
  • increases the load on the evaporators. In the
  • Birkett & Stein study, we see that single deck tables
  • average 4.7% adhering water by weight, dual deck
  • tables average 11.3%, and a washing drum
  • averages 16.3%. In this dense medium process,
  • the outgoing cane is rinsed twice: once with
66
Adhering Water
  • re-circulating rinse water, and then with a final
  • clean water. It would be easy to equip the exit side
  • of the floats trommel with lifters so as to tumble
  • and dry the billets, but this might release a lot of
  • sugar. We propose instead that the exit side of the
  • trommel be fitted with a series of air knives that
  • would remove adhering water without impacting
  • the billet in any way.
67
Air Separation
  • The leaves and tops of the sugarcane plant contain
  • no sugar, and those that accompany the billet into
  • the mill can be easily removed by means of an air
  • separator. Since it is very important in air
  • separation to minimize particle interference, the
  • billets should be spread out over a broad two-
  • dimensional plane, and the blower should be
  • situated in-line with the flow of billets.
68
Air Separation
  • This air separator can be situated right above the
  • injector of the dense medium separator. After
  • air separation, the billets should slide directly into
  • the mouth of the injector. This would reduce the
  • impact on the billet and minimize the loss of
  • sugar.
69
Dual Strategy
  • Hopefully it is clear that this dual strategy of air
  • separation and dense medium separation can
  • eliminate virtually all organic and inorganic trash.
  • What mill in Louisiana has ever considered the
  • possibility of processing billets without extraneous
  • material? It is hard to imagine what this should
  • mean. For the first time ever, a mill will be able to
  • operate under constraints that are truly internal.
70
Elimination of Externalities
  • A mill would possess a level of control in daily
  • operations that it has never before experienced.
  • More sugar would be recovered. Production would
  • stabilize at a very high rate. Operating and
  • maintenance cost would decrease considerably.
  • Rain and even hurricanes would have minimal
  • impact on profitability. And if we turn once again
  • to Europe,
71
The European Model
  • we find to our amazement, that some vegetable
  • brokers there have even figured out how to avoid
  • trucking extraneous material to a factory and
  • hauling it away. Taking full advantage of this dense
  • medium separation technology, they set up de-
  • centralized pre-processing centers in proximity to
  • clusters of growers, and only clean vegetables are
  • transported to the cannery.
72
Leaving Trash Where It Belongs
  • What would such a distribution model mean to the
  • Louisiana sugar industry? What if relatively small
  • dense medium separators were strategically situated
  • so that only clean billets would be transported to the
  • mill? Leaving trash where it belongs cannot be such
  • a bad idea, and surely the grower is better equipped
  • than anyone else to deal with it. Each ton that the
  • grower delivers to the mill would be a ton of billets
73
Harvester Capacity
  • and nothing else. A modern billet harvester in full
  • operation has a capacity of 200 TPH, but when we
  • look at the total number of harvesters and the total
  • tonnage of cane harvested in a given season, we see
  • that a harvester averages less than 20 TPH. The
  • Louisiana cane industry has invested over $80
  • million dollars in harvester technology, more than
  • twice what is demanded to meet its harvesting
74
Investment in Separators
  • needs. At the same time, the cane industry would
  • have to invest roughly $30 million dollars in dense
  • medium separation technology. A 50% reduction
  • in the number of harvesters equates to a savings
  • of over $40 million dollars and easily covers the
  • cost of this dense medium separation technology.
  • The savings in the transport of trash to and from the
  • mill would be well over $10 M dollars per season.
75
Farmers Working Together
  • Imagine a group of cane farmers working
  • together: with one farmer specializing in harvesting,
  • a second in dense medium separation, and a third in
  • transport. If the primary objective is to make
  • money, then a collaborative effort among farmers in
  • the harvesting, cleaning and transport of the billet
  • would be the most logical way to proceed.
76
Conclusion
  • Such an approach would simplify every aspect of
  • this complex sugar-making enterprise. It would
  • offer growers and factories a myriad of new options
  • and new economic opportunities, and at the same
  • time, it would secure, safeguard and stabilize one of
  • our state’s oldest and most important industries.